🚨Nate will be live at 3:30 p.m. ET 🚨
He’ll do some live trading with Lance, check in on earnings and see what Lance’s new AI assistant is spotting ahead of the big reports [tap to join them for Closing Playbook]!
Let me settle something that keeps coming up in my sessions: Traders asking why I don’t just trade iron condors instead of butterflies.
I get it. Iron condors feel safer. Wider profit range, higher win rate, less precision required. But here’s what most traders miss — you’re optimizing for win rate when you should be optimizing for profit factor and expected value.
Profit factor is the ratio of your gross profits to your gross losses, and expected value is your average gain or loss per trade over time. Those two numbers tell you whether a strategy actually makes money, and butterflies dominate on both.
And when you run the math, iron condors lose in every scenario except one — and it’s a scenario that rarely happens.
The Only Time Iron Condors Actually Win
There’s one situation where an iron condor can outperform a butterfly: when price consistently closes at the far edges of your spread without triggering a loss. Not in the middle where you make money. Not outside where you lose. Right at those narrow edge zones where you’re just barely profitable. That edge-pin behavior would need to happen again and again, which simply isn’t how markets usually move.
That’s it. That’s the entire advantage.
Everywhere else — and I mean everywhere — the butterfly structure delivers stronger returns. When you’re comfortably in the middle of your range, butterflies pay massive returns of 100% to 200% by pinning the center strike, while iron condors give you linear, capped profits.
And here’s the part that destroys the win rate argument…
If you set up an iron condor with the same break-evens as a butterfly, you get the same win rate. Same probability. Same risk of being outside your range. But now you’ve traded away all that profit potential for nothing.
Why the Structure Matters More Than You Think
The instinct to choose iron condors usually comes from fear — fear of being too precise, fear of missing by a few points, fear of taking a loss. Almost every version of this debate traces back to that fear. The best trading strategies are built to maximize the money you make over time, not the number of trades you win.
High win rates feel reassuring, but they don’t pay you the way strong expected value does.
An iron fly is mathematically identical to a butterfly — you’re just converting strikes between puts and calls. Whether you use a long call butterfly or a long put butterfly, they’re equivalent within about $1 because of bid-ask spreads. The structure is what creates the profit curve, not the direction.
And when you’re trading 0DTE strategies like Bullseye Trades, where you can nail down expiration and predict the close with high accuracy, you’re not guessing anymore. You’re consistently landing in that high-profit middle zone where butterflies generate 100% to 200% returns instead of settling for the capped payouts of iron condors.
Even when you don’t nail it perfectly, a 60% or 90% return beats what you’d get from an iron condor in the same scenario. Every time.
Stop chasing win rate. Start chasing profit factor. The math doesn’t lie — and in this case, it’s not even close.
Kane Shieh
Kane Shieh Trading
Follow along and join the conversation for real-time analysis, trade ideas, market insights and more!
Important Note: No one from The TradingPub team or Kane Shieh Trading will ever contact you directly on Telegram.
*This is for informational and educational purposes only. There is inherent risk in trading, so trade at your own risk.
P.S. The Bullseye Effect In the S&P 500 Is Changing Everything!
I recently went on camera with former hedge fund manager Roger Scott to expose a stunning discovery on the S&P 500…
Tipping off some of the most lucrative end-of-day trades market-wide!
Fair warning: You’re in for a stunner!
